COLONEL BARRY TURNER'S CUTTING COMMENTARY ON COLEMAN'S COMMITTEE OF 300 PRESENTATION

I will try to do a little to the interview, what Col Barry Turner did to Colemans book. Although I must say, I agree absolutely on Col Barry Turners view on the Monarchy, although I am a Republican myself. While supporting Her Majesty my Queen of Holland. Dutch Monarchy is fundamental different from British Monarchy in the way that the Queen or King of England is also head of Church, while in the Netherlands the Queen or Prince is subject to Jesus Christ, that is the King of the Community, in an intellectual comprehended way.

I would read Colemans book some years ago, because it was one of the books in the Armageddon Survival Kit by the powerful British Prophet JAH.
http://www.jahtruth.net/
I figured out myself what Col Turner figured out in the google video. Put in my words, that Colemans book is propaganda. The British Prophet JAH might be a powerful prophet, his work is full of mistakes. But I regard JAH as an honest man, while Coleman is not, neither is Jeff Rense. Col. Turner refers to Jeff Rense as a source that is promoting Colemans book. Well, if I hear the name Jeff Rense, than I know it must be propaganda and lies! If you want to understand what I am talking about, you might want to figure out how Rense handled Professor Eric Phelps. Once you understand that Jeff Rense is only propaganda lies, it is interesting to observe his agenda. He is at least not concerned with the truth, I wonder what he is concerned about.

Colonel Turner starts of with wearing a tie. The tie is invented in Croatia, where also the Ustashe where formed.
http://www.croata.com/homeland/index.php
On this page the history on the neck—tie.

So people that wear a necktie, I call members of Ustashe. I have found a lot more on Necktie research, that started off when I discovered, that Adolph Hitler was wearing a Neck—tie during the Putsch in Munchen, for which he went to Prison. Unfortunately not for wearing a neck—tie, but for starting this revolt. Hitler was the only one that would wear a tie on the photo I remember. This photo I think was after Cardinal Pacelli, later pope Pius 12th, would give Hitler a pile of banknotes in order to fight Communism, as was stated by the Vatican in connection to the Fatima, Mohammed’s 7th wife, miracles in Portugal some 25 years before. Very complicated, I will try to keep this comment short.

Colonel Turner starts of with an example, that Colemans book looks like some one, that still believes in Santa Claus. Well, well. So Colonel Turner thinks, that it is legal to lie to small children. Like most brainwashed puppets in Europe,. The Santa Claus feast was prohibited in the Netherlands during Reformation. Santa Claus is an actor, dressed up as a Cardinal, having moslem type Swiss guards around him. Or her, he wears a dress. Transgender with a beard. In the Netherlands, the popish media are very fanatic in this propaganda, that is not innocent. Contrary, children get brainwashed at the age of 3 years old. This Cardinal, a Scarlet Threat, is called Bishop, although he has no purple in his popish red dress with miter. He is called: The Good Holy Man. So 3 things are lied about: A lie about Holy, a lie about Good, a lie about Man. And if children do not get warned by friends at school, people will believe that lie until they die at an old age. However stupid it may look, the latter is the purpose of the lie. Trust between children and parents is completely destroyed, once the children have found out, that their parents can not be trusted, but are dangerous Papists. Hellish creatures, that hate them and have joy in fun called lies and ignorant propaganda based on commercial plastic destruction of culture an planet Earth. Colonel Turner talks about this, as if such children brainwash is normal.
Is he publishing about politics?
Politics starts with propaganda, Turner knows nothing!
Better you would have asked me…

Than Col. Turner goes on about the Boer war. The British invented Concentration Camps. That’s the truth. Winston Churchill was part of this, was fighting the Dutch in South Africa. Ehr, if Americans visit here: I AM YOUR GREATEST FAN! So I listen to American Conspiracy research, and found out, that Americans do not know, that South Africa was a Dutch Community, that was attacked by British, just like New Amsterdam was attacked by the British some century before. Ehr, New York, after the Duke of York, some papist like Sir Thomas Moore.

Never trust the British.
Not that British would not be nice people, contrary, many British I like very much. But every time in history, they proof that they can not be trusted. Germans, these you can trust. But not to smart: Adolph Hitler was Austrian. Nationalism?

But back to the topic:
Troy says, that his current opinion is, that one can not trust their very cute and honorable Queen, because she is a Knight of Malta. The photo’s proof it. Well, only little research is needed to find out, that the Knights of Malta have several branches. There are Protestant and Catholic Knights of Malta. The protestant branches have also several branches, some are dangerous. It is a very huge organization. For a common man, it might seem an honor to be knighted, but to Aristocracy, it is one of many titles. My Queen has more than 20 titles, one of them being a Dame of Malta. It is only words or names, content can be whatever the giver of such titles decide them to be. And very often, these titles are used against the ones that where given that title. Avro Manhattan is a good example. Avro Manhattan, one of the greatest writers from the 20th century, was knighted a Knight of Malta. This has boosted the Knight of Malta reputation. I wonder whether Avro Manhattan even knew, that Benito Mussolini was a Knight of Malta also, because Internet did not exist yet during his life.

I would see a movie on Prince Charles some while ago. The issues that he is supporting, are very very important issues. I’m sorry Troy, you have not convinced me with your Maltese Knights connection. I think Prince Charles is a hero, and a great man. Compared to Tony Blair, and one might consider some change here. Aristocracy has very little power, while Papists like Tony Blair can start wars based on lies, do not get arrested for that, and might even become President of the European Union for this Unpunished High Treason of a war based on a lie about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. Tony Blair and most British Parliaments since around 1800 have committed themselves to such things. I would read about the role of Winston Churchill in this setting up British Concentration Camps for Dutch Citizens in South Africa. These Dutch that already where defeated some half century before by French Napoleon Bonaparte and the Propaganda of Freemasonry, Jesuit infiltration, just Flying Dutchman fleeing Hully Inquisition. Once looked at it this way, Germans might be smarter than British…

Tony Blair.
Hmmm.
Some time ago, Troy would publish some photo’s on Pope meetings in the Vatican. Many political leaders, his cute Queen. But this famous photo of Tony Blair betraying Britain by signing the European Constitution at Capitoline Hill in Rome before the Referendum under a huge statue of the Pope in black, was not put amongst them Troy page photo’s. At first I though, Troy must be lazy, or did not know that very important photo. More I not say. I’m not sure yet, whether I can trust Troy.
;-/

Hi Geus

I have taken my time in replying to comments on my blogs due to a variety of reasons, including being very bogged down on forums with debating to defend the position of Eric, Craig, myself & others that the true controller of the NWO is Rome, as well as on other matters.

Something has to give or else I’ll be spending my whole life answering comments. I do enjoy your interesting obsevations, but please help me out by making them a little bit more concise, as I’m having trouble finding the time to handle all correspondence. I also have an email list which is very time-consuming. Please don’t think that I am beating around the bush here & trying to imply anything other than what I’ve said. With work demands time is a real commodity for me.

In reply to:

“Colonel Turner starts of with an example, that Colemans book looks like some one, that still believes in Santa Claus. Well, well. So Colonel Turner thinks, that it is legal to lie to small children… Colonel Turner talks about this, as if such children brainwash is normal.”

That’s jumping to conclusions, even if he does. As that conclusion cannot be reasonably deduced from Turner’s statement you already have a stumbling block there & I would ask you to reconsider this point.

I appreciated your info though on “Satan Claus” ;D Personally, I think that his appearance is intended to evoke the Pope & not any mere Cardinal.

“Never trust the British.
Not that British would not be nice people, contrary, many British I like very much. But every time in history, they proof that they can not be trusted.”

Hmmm, perhaps not. But the English & Scots? Definitely trustworthy! Well some anyway! ;D To tell th truth, these days I think most people, most places are dumbed down to an obscene & harmful degree (harmful to themselves & others).

“Troy says, that his current opinion is, that one can not trust their very cute and honorable Queen, because she is a Knight of Malta. The photo’s proof it. Well, only little research is needed to find out, that the Knights of Malta have several branches. There are Protestant and Catholic Knights of Malta. … I’m sorry Troy, you have not convinced me with your Maltese Knights connection.”

I have posted more fully on this at the Outlaw Forum (excerpts below) with more supporting photo evidence. Note that when you say in your second comment:

“In another comment, I would talk about my Queen being so brave not to dress in black, but this was given because when Pope John 2nd visited Holland, no one showed up.”

No, this is not the reason. The Monarchs are allowed to dress how they please when the Pope visits. When they visit him this is another matter & “non-Catholic” Monarchs (I stop short of calling these crypto-Papists “Protestants” as they are nothing of the sort) are not allowed to wear Papal white (which is the colour reserved for Catholic Monarchs ), they must wear the more deferential black.

As I posted in the excerpt below from:

http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/page2214.asp

“The Queen meets Pope John Paul II in the Vatican in 2000. The Queen is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England, while the Pope is the Head of the Catholic Church. In accordance with Vatican tradition, visiting Protestant Sovereigns wear black and visiting Catholic Sovereigns wear white when meeting His Holiness”

Geus, you also wrote: “And I also wanted to mention, that I am just doing research on the British position, where my current conclusion is, that Britain is in fact the same as the USA, controlled by a Continuing Counter Reformation.” which implies that by your second comment you had adopted a different position to your original comment. I found this a bit hard to follow.

I was bemused by the following:

“Ehr, this ending does not look good.
I hope visitors understand, that Troy is in fact a great hero, if he can be trusted. I am just worried about infiltration, and I have no proof about Troy’s position. My current take on it is, that Troy can be trusted and is an honest man, but I do not know him very long yet.”

It’s all just information to compare & contrast with that you have come across already & that which you will come across from this moment hence. Take it or leave it, Geus. What is it that you’re worried about being infiltrated & by whom? I would suggest that any infiltration that you may be concerned about has already taken place, whether in churches or the conspiracy arena. If this really bugs you then look at my debates at the EJPO Thread at the Outlaw Forum to be in a better position to come to a conclusion.

From Page 7:

http://www.outlawjournalism.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1853&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=120

To Page 16 (to date):

http://www.outlawjournalism.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1853&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=300

The last few pages there are quite interesting I think.

You also stated:

“Tony Blair.
Hmmm.
Some time ago, Troy would publish some photo’s on Pope meetings in the Vatican. Many political leaders, his cute Queen. But this famous photo of Tony Blair betraying Britain by signing the European Constitution at Capitoline Hill in Rome before the Referendum under a huge statue of the Pope in black, was not put amongst them Troy page photo’s. At first I though, Troy must be lazy, or did not know that very important photo. More I not say. I’m not sure yet, whether I can trust Troy.
;-/”

Geus, I cannot remember if I have or haven’t used this photo at this Research Resource or not. There’s well over 200 pages here. So I think that it’s rather strange that you get wound up over whether or not I have used it.

I can say that I used it in a forum post a couple of weeks later, when I was writing about the EU being a Vatican/Jesuit project:

http://www.outlawjournalism.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1853&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=260

Comments like those above are – how can I put this politely? Unhelpful, shall we say & not exactly conducive to getting me to prioritise posting a reply. Understand that I have a very stressful timetable with work in an energy-sapping, demanding job (no, not as some James Bond or his office staff!) & remarks like that don’t endear me to anyone.

Back to the matter of the Queen’s position relative to Rome:

Also consider that the Queen’s Church of England is subject to the Pontifex Maximus of the Church of Rome.

As I posted (with photo evidence) at “Outlaw Forum” (& excuse me if you’ve already read this – note to other readers, I am not directly addressing Geus with the style of my aggressive defence below, as he has always been reasonably polite) on the matter of the Queen & the Church of England’s submission to the Pope & the Roman Catholic Church upper hierarchy in Rome:

—————————————————————————————————————-

http://www.outlawjournalism.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2536&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

So you suggest that Queen Elizabeth II is Top Dog compared with the Jesuits & the Pope? When was this supposed to have happened?

The Queen’s Order of St John is part of the Order of Malta franchise & she wears the Maltese cross, the SMOM far predating this British Order of St John. In the early 1960′s this connection was made overt in an Alliance between the SMOM, the Order of St John & its associated European Johanniterorden.

When she visits the successive Popes, she must always wear deferential black that all nominally Protestant monarchs must wear in contrast to the superior symbolic status attributed to Catholic monarchs, who like the Pope wear white.

http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/page2214.asp

The Queen being a “Protestant” is a farce anyway. The Windsors are the Roman Catholic Saxe-Coburg-Gothas:

See:

http://troyspace2.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/the-pope-the-queen-westminster-cathedral-windsors-saxe-coburg-gothas-are-catholics/

Where we discover that the Queen was the first British monarch to be allowed into Westminster Cathedral (not to be confused with the [covertly Papal-controlled] Church of England’s Westminster Abbey for hundreds of years. This invitation was extended in 1995 by Cardinal Hume, the Archbishop of Westminster (the “English Pope”) from 1976-1999.

Further reading:

Illuminati Descendants Assemble for an Eyes Wide Shut-like “Heaven and Hell” Bash

http://troyspace2.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/windsors-saxe-coburg-gothas-are-direct-descendants-of-high-bavarian-illuminati-duke-ernst-ii/

Cult of Mithra-Seth…

http://troyspace2.wordpress.com/2008/06/22/cult-of-mithra-seth/

Church of England’s Capitulation to Antichrist Vatican

http://troyspace2.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/church-of-englands-capitulation-to-antichrist-vatican/

Via the so-called Society of Jesus (the Jesuits), Opus Dei, the Papal-loyal Knighthood Orders network (the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, the Order of St Januarius, the Sacred Military Constantinian Order of St George, the Royal Order of Francis I, the Order of the Holy Sepulchre, the Knights of Columbus, the Order of St Sylvester, the Order of St Gregory, the House of Savoy’s Order of Sts Maurice & Lazarus, the Teutonic Knights etc, etc, the list goes on & on, but those are some of the most significant ones) & their endless connections to global politics, military, intelligence, finance & industry, not to mention entwinedness with high-level “regular” (openly UGLE-alligned) & “irregular” Freemasonry (Grand Orient Freemasonry, Memphis-Misraim, CLIPSAS network, P2, etc), the reach of Rome is unparalleled, a situation that has remained static for over two millennium, despite what they teach in schools about “American” hegemony.

A close inspection at the following page will reveal that the photographs say a thousand words each regarding this situation of Roman supremacy:

Rome’s Control of the New World Order in Pictures

http://troyspace2.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/romes-control-of-the-new-world-order-in-pictures/

It is also worth noting the following:

http://troyspace2.wordpress.com/about/

* KEY ROYAL & ARISTOCRATIC FREEMASONS:

- Prince Edward, Duke of Kent : Cousin to both Queen Elizabeth II & the Duke of Gloucester, the Duke of Kent is the “Most Worshipful” Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) & is also First Grand Principal of the Supreme Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons of England & Grand Master of the Order of St Michael & St George. Note that his wife Katharine, Duchess of Kent converted to Roman Catholicism in 1994, as did their son Lord Nicholas Windsor in 2001, who then went on to get married in the Vatican in 2006.

- Spencer Compton, 7th Marquess of Northampton: The UGLE Pro [Deputy] Grand Master & is also the Pro [Deputy] First Grand Principal of the Supreme Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons of England.

- Prince Michael of Kent: The Duke of Kent’s brother, Prince Michael is the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Mark Master Masons. His wife, Princess Michael of Kent, has always been a Roman Catholic & is a Dame Grand Cross of Honour and Devotion of the (Papal-loyal) SMOM, within the Order’s British Association. Princess Michael is also the senior Dame (Dame Grand Cross of Justice) of the British and Irish Delegation of the Franco-Neapolitan branch of the (Papal-loyal) Constantinian Order.

The Marquess of Northampton (Spencer Compton – who at UK £70 million is Britain’s richest “Buddhist” FWIW!), Julian Reese of the Cornerstone Society & around 50 other UGLE-alligned English Freemasons are Vatican-loyal subversives (subversive to English sovereignty in preference to the Jesuit/Papal European Union that is).

Consider too that the Queen invited Cardinal Murphy O’Connor, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Westminster (the current “English Pope” from 2000 to date), to conduct a family service at her home in Sandringham on January 13, 2002. This was considered (by the Profane press) to be quite an unusual move.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1693795.stm

PICS OF QUEEN ELIZABETH II IN DEFERENTIAL BLACK WITH THE POPE IN THE VATICAN (POPE JOHN XXIII IN MAY 1961 & JOHN PAUL II IN OCTOBER 1980 & OCTOBER 2000:

[These are posted at: http://www.outlawjournalism.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2536&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 ]

http://www.outlawjournalism.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2536&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=20

If we go to my blog & to my source, the website of the Franco-Neapolitan Constantinian Order & Royal Order of Francis I, we can see that the Archbishop of Canterbury, acting head of the Church of Englan & his predecessor are both members of the Papal-loyal Royal Order of Francis I:

http://troyspace2.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/c-of-e-archbishop-williams-is-a-papal-knight-of-francis-i/

“Dear fellow researchers,

Please find below a most informative list of a number of very influential public figures who it turns out are Knights & Dames of the Papal-loyal Catholic Order of Francis I, headed by Prince Carlo, the Duke of Castro, the Grand Master of the Constantinian Order (Franco-Neapolitan branch).

On the website of the Franco-Neapolitan branch of the Constantinian Order it states quite clearly: “The Royal Order of Francis I, together with its sister Order, the Sacred Military Constantinian Order of St George, continues to lead the way among lay Catholic knightly associations and brotherhoods”

The Royal Order of Francis I is a CATHOLIC Order – in the words of its own administrators!

The “inter-religious” rhetoric is a cloak for Rome’s dissolving all faiths into her syncretic, synthetic fold.

The Neo-Druid (a Papist Druid? After the Roman genocide of the Druids? What a sick joke!) Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams – head of the Church of England below the Queen of England – & the others (including Williams’ predecessor plus Saudi, Yemeni, Moroccan & even Danish royals & many persons within the English & Irish Establishments) listed below are loyal to the deceitful, totalitarian Papacy, disloyal to their own nations & the practitioners of non-Papist faiths, leading the unaware headlong into Rome’s planned New Dark Ages code-named the New World Order.”

Let’s now go to my source:

http://www.constantinian.com/dynastic-francis.html

Where we discover:

http://www.constantinian.com/dynastic-francis.html#religiousleaders

“Among the leaders of other Christian denominations who have been invested with the Royal Order of Francis I in recognition of their ecumenical achievements are, His Grace The Most Reverend and Right Honourable Dr Rowan Williams, Lord Archbishop of Canterbury and Primate of the Anglican Communion…, The Right Reverend and Right Honourable Lord Carey of Clifton, former Lord Archbishop of Canterbury and His Eminence Archbishop Gregorios of Thyateira and Great Britain, Head of the Greek Orthodox Church in Great Britain…”

http://www.constantinian.com/dynastic-francis.html#interfaithdial

“The Royal Order of Francis I, together with its sister Order, the Sacred Military Constantinian Order of St George, continues to lead the way among lay Catholic knightly associations and brotherhoods”

Do we want the full photo evidence of this capitulation of the (False) Church of England to the Church of Rome?:

Let’s see:

http://troyspace2.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/church-of-englands-capitulation-to-antichrist-vatican/

And I’ll give credit to the ever eagle-eyed Craig Oxley for spotting these photos & originally posting them all together at his Unhived Mind site:

http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mind_II/index.php?act=idx

Yes a Masonic grip between these two Ultra High-level Masons, both subject to the Ultimate Head of Freemasonry, the 30th Jesuit Superior-General, Adolfo Nicolas. What a surprise…

Quote:

“There was a Law brought in over 300 years ago that disallows Catholics from becoming King/Queen of England and it’s still in operation Today.”

& elaborating on my response to:

“Also – the Queen is head of the C of E (Church of England) Which is not Catholic. So go figure.”

These laws are a mockery! Do you think that the Roman Empire cares about these laws? Are they Roman Canon Law? No!

Understand this regarding the Queen of England, nominal/symbolic head of the so-called Church of England. The House of Windsor changed its name fro the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha in 1917. And what is the history of their religious loyalties?:

VATICAN ALLEGIANCE OF HOUSE OF SAXE-COBURG-GOTHA (WINDSOR)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxe_Coburg_Gotha

“The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha was formerly the Royal
House of several European monarchies, and branches currently reign in Belgium through the descendants of Leopold I, and in the United Kingdom and its associated Commonwealth realms through the descendants of Prince Albert. In the United Kingdom, King George V changed the name from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to the House of Windsor in 1917. The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha is a line of the Saxon House of Wettin.”

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13494a.htm

Catholic Encyclopedia: “Saxe-Coburg and Gotha” (article about the duchy, with details of religious issues, written in 1910)

“One of the Saxon-Thuringian duchies; has an area of 751 sq. miles and two chief divisions, the Duchy of Coburg (216 sq. miles) and the Duchy of Gotha (541 sq. miles). These divisions are separated from each other by a portion of Saxe-Meiningen and a strip of land belonging to Prussia (Kreis Schleusingen).

In 1910 the territory had 257,208 inhabitants; in 1905 its population of 242,432 included 3897 Catholics (2 per cent), 237,187 Evangelicals, and 714 Jews. The two duchies were united in 1826 but each territory has still its own constitution, diet, and internal administration, even as regardsreligion and education. Only for certain specified kinds of business do the diets hold a common session.

Apart from the separation of the two states — and the marked difference in the extent of their Crown lands which greatly influences questions of taxation — racial differences also contribute to keep the states separate, the inhabitants of Saxe-Gotha being of Saxon stock and the inhabitants of Saxe-Coburg of Frankish.

The two duchies originated in the division of the ancestral estates of Duke Ernest the Pious (d. 1675), the founder of all the Saxon ducal lines (except the grand-ducal line of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach), among his seven sons. With Duke Frederick IV, who had become a Catholic at Rome in 1807, the line of Saxe-Gotha became extinct (1821), and, after long disputes concerning the succession, the territory of Gotha fell to the line of Coburg-Saalfeld in 1826. Members of the ruling house of Coburg-Gotha ascended the thrones of several European countries during the nineteenth century. By his marriage with Queen Victoria (1840), Prince Albert became the founder of the present royal house of England; Prince Leopold was elected hereditary King of Belgium in 1831, the Belgian branch of the House of Saxe-Coburg becoming Catholic. The line of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (often called Coburg-Kohary), founded through the marriage of Prince Ferdinand with the heiress of the Hungarian princely House of Kohary (1816), is also Catholic. A son of this marriage, Ferdinand, was the founder (1837) of the dynasty which ruled in Portugal until 1910; a grandson, also named Ferdinand, became in 1887 hereditary Prince, and in 1909 King (Tsar) of Bulgaria. In the Duchy of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha the main line became extinct in 1893, the succession falling to the English branch; Duke Charles Edward (b. 1884), son of the Duke of Albany and grandson of the Prince Consort Albert and Queen Victoria, has reigned since 1899 (until 1905 under a guardian).”

—————————————————————————————————————-

Finally Geus:

For some more to consider on Avro Manhattan, I’ll leave you with some comments by Eric Phelps from various email replies to people who have emailed him:

—————————————————————————————————————-

Dear Friends,

Avro Manhattan, the greatest 20th century historian on the crimes of the Vatican, was indeed a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor. He was a member of British Intelligence (MI5, MI6); was a personal friend of MI5/CIA/KGB agent Kim Philby; was a Fabian Socialist by which wicked organization the Jesuits put Lenin in power in 1917; was a personal friend of the Order’s Irish Catholic Fabian Socialist, Irish Home Ruler and friend of Stalin enjoying the red carpet into Moscow during the reign of “Koba;” and was a friend of New Ager Freemason H. G. Wells—the writer of The Time Machine depicting the loss of the history and culture of the White Protestant peoples then being preyed upon by cannibals.

Manhattan was also a great promoter of the Pope’s Cold War Hoax. He never exposed Rome’s control of Moscow or Peking. Avro was a most successful Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor and is described as such in VAIII.

Sincerely in Faith,

Brother Eric
____________________

Manhattan played the right-wing, conservative anti-communist when he knew the Cold War was a hoax. He was also British Intelligence and thus connected to Spellman’s CIA-led, anti-communist crusade. Manhattan also never revealed the fact that the Jesuits ruled both England and the US—just like another great traitor, Ian Paisley who has now sold out the Northern Irish Protestants.

Brother Eric
__________________________________

From Eric Phelps.

QUOTE

Avro Manhattan

I believe that English Protestant Knight of Malta Avro Manhattan was a disinformation agent in key areas. As you may know, he was British SIS and knew brother Knight of Malta Kim Philby—that triple intelligence agent (MI6, CIA and KGB) who, in 1963, “defected” to Moscow.

As proven in VA, the Black Pope rules all the intelligence agencies of the world, their leaders being Knights of Malta and/or 33rd Degree Freemasons. Thus the Cold War was a total Hoax, the Jesuits openly siding with the West against the USSR, but secretly ruling the East, Moscow and Peking. Manhattan promoted this nefarious Cold War Hoax as did 33rd Degree Freemason and American traitor General Douglas MacArthur. As long as Avro kept up the illusion of the Airborne Nuclear War Hoax (as no atomic bombs were ever dropped in Japan, but were detonated on the ground with magnesium flash bombs laced with radioactive material dropped from B-29s then airbursting above Hiroshima and Nagasaki) and thus the Cold War Hoax, he could write openly against irrefutable acts of mass-murder committed by the Papacy during WWII.

But let him expose the power of the Jesuit Order behind Masons Winston Churchill, FDR and Stalin, and he would have been removed from the public view—for good. Manhattan knew that Kim Philby, Anthony Blunt and James Angleton were Knights of Malta and ran the Vatican’s intelligence apparatus in the West. He also knew that Angleton’s Soviet counterpart, KGB officer Anatoli M. Golitsin, was a Russian Knight of Malta and that both were orchestrating the movements of the CIA and KGB for the benefit of the Black Pope’s KGB, now SVR. VAIII further solidifies this irrefutable connection, for which reason VAI is being sold on Amazon for outrageous prices only to be disposed of ASAP.

Manhattan apparently was truly saved under the ministry of Ian Paisley. But then I have my doubts about Ian as he never exposes the Jesuit rule of Britain, especially from WWI to the present hour. Surely he must know that both the British MI5/MI6 and the IRA are being coordinated together for the destruction of Protestant Northern Ireland. Why would he ever think that the British Parliament would ever protect Northern Ireland from destruction? In fact, it would not surprise me that a mini-nuke will be detonated in Belfast or Ulster, killing thousands of Protestants while then enabling the Order’s Roman Catholic Ireland to absorb the North—the ultimate goal of the Black Pope’s IRA. Further, this terrorist event would drive England and Scotland into the arms of the Papacy and the EEC. Like Toronto, Belfast fits the bill.

You have a point about the Order’s Illuminati laughing at us in the face of the facts put forth by Manhattan. The same thing was done through the production of JFK, Director’s Cut and Enemy of the State.
______________

Dear Brother Ricardo,

Avro Manhattan was an English Knight of Malta involved with British Intelligence. He helped ex-Jesuit Alberto Rivera escape London and was later converted to Christ by the preaching of Ian Paisley—according to David Daniels of Chick Publications. My concern is that AM never exposed Spellman in the JFK assassination and he never exposed the Vatican control of the British government. He always gave creedence to the pope’s Cold War Hoax and the Airborne Nuclear War Hoax. I think he was an agent of Rome until the day he died.

Concerning Malachi Martin, he advocated the lie that there were three superpowers struggling for world dominion between themselves—as though these three powers were real enemies. They were the papacy, the US and the USSR. This is absloutely bogus and MM knew that the Black Pope controlled all three powers during WWII and thereafter. He was a Jesuit of supreme inside knowledge and remained a Jesuit until the day of his murder. He must have went too far.

Sincerely in faith,

Brother Eric

reality research resource

COLONEL BARRY TURNER'S CUTTING COMMENTARY ON COLEMAN'S COMMITTEE OF 300 PRESENTATION

CoLoNeL BaRRY TuRNeR’S CuTTiNG CoMMeNTaRY oN CoLeMaN’S CoMMiTTee oF 300 PReSeNTaTioN

Like this:

About this entry

4 Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

About

REALITY RESEARCH RESOURCE -

Like this:

Recently

Categories

Follow “reality research resource”